Rapid Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Transients of Lemna minor Leaves as Indication of Light and Exogenous Electron Carriers Effect on Photosystem II Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By using saturating flash, we investigated the change in the rapid fluorescence rise when Lemna minor leaf was exposed to different light conditions and treated with exogenous electron acceptors (methyl viologen and duroquinone) and electron donor (hydroxylamine). Investigation was carried out by using combined pulse amplitude modulated fluorometer and plant efficiency analyzer system, which were employed simultaneously to provide different light conditions and to induce rapid fluorescence rise respectively. We have shown that when leaf of L. minor was exposed to different conditions of illumination, rapid fluorescence rise was greatly influenced by the electron transport functions beyond quinone A-plastoquinone reduction. This was indicated by the change in both fluorescence yield and appearance time of the different transients. When exogenous electron donor (hydroxylamine) and acceptors (methyl viologen and duroquinone) were applied in in vivo condition, we showed that rapid fluorescence rise represented a reliable indicator of PSII-PSI electron transport state and energy dissipation process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".