THE QUASI-PARISH: A DEFINITE COMMUNITY OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITHFUL IN A PARTICULAR CHURCH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La legislation du Code de 1917 a permis l'erection de quasi-paroisses seulement en territoire missionnaire. Le Code de 1983, pourtant, permet l'etablissement de quasi-paroisses dans chaque eglise particuliere. Cet article retrace le developpement du canon 516 § 1 sur la quasi-paroisse et la compare a la paroisse, qui est la structure ordinaire pour la charge pastorale dans une eglise particuliere. L'auteur identifie des similarites et des differences fondamentales entre les quasi-paroisses et les paroisses. Il conclut qu'une quasi-paroisse est une personne publique juridique; que l'eveque diocesain doit entendre le conseil presbyteral avant d'eriger, de modifier ou de supprimer une quasi-paroisse; et que le quasi-parochus a les memes munera et la stabilite paroissiale d'un parochus. Il identifie egalement les circonstances, extrinseque et intrinseque, qui peuvent ou ne peuvent pas etre l'occasion d'etablir une quasi-paroisse plutot qu'une paroisse. L'auteur conclut que la quasi-paroisse est une option, bien que non favorisee, a etre consideree par les eveques diocesains lorsqu'ils modifient des communautes dans leurs eglises particulieres en reponse aux changements des circonstances sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".