Abstract 2329: Donor Pretreatment with Hypertonic Saline Attenuates Primary Cardiac Allograft Dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Hypertonic saline (HTS) has been previously demonstrated to have immune modulatory and vascular protective effects. We assessed the effect of donor pretreatment with HTS on allograft myocardial function in a porcine model of orthotopic heart transplantation. We hypothesized that HTS infusion prior to donor heart arrest and storage would limit ischemia-reperfusion injury and improve myocardial performance following transplantation. Methods: Orthotopic transplants were performed after 6 hours of ischemic allograft storage. Donor pigs were randomly assigned to pretreatment with (n = 7) or without (n = 6) HTS (4.5 ml/kg of 7.5% NaCl) administered 1 hour prior to donor heart arrest. Left ventricular performance was determined after caval occlusion using a Millar micromanometer and conductance catheter. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained using a Swan-Ganz catheter. Results: Administration of hypertonic saline increased serum sodium level from 138 ± 2 mmol/L to 154 ± 4 mmol/L, which normalized to 144 ± 3 mmol/L 1 hour post-infusion. Weaning from CPB and LV performance after transplantation was improved after donor HTS treatment. Successful weaning from CPB was significantly greater in HTS treated hearts (6/7 versus 1/6, p < 0.05). Preload recruitable stroke work post-transplantation was improved compared to control (88 ± 21% versus 35 ± 8% of baseline, p < 0.01). Similarly, maximal elastance was improved compared to control (85 ± 17% versus 42 ± 12% of baseline, p = 0.03). No significant differences in post-transplant central venous, pulmonary artery or pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were observed between groups. However, post-transplant systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in the donor HTS group (60 ± 9 mmHg versus 35 ± 6 mmHg, p = 0.04). Conculsions: Donor HTS pretreatment attenuates post-transplant cardiac allograft myocardial function and improves post-transplant systemic hemodynamic function. HTS may be a novel organ donor intervention to prevent primary graft dysfunction. Further clinical evaluation of this simple and potentially cost-effective intervention is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".