MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1591976139

Abstract 19744: Protective Effect of Nrf2 on Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Murine Heart Transplantation

2014· article· en· W1591976139 on OpenAlexaff
Hiroyuki Kawajiri, A. Ghashghai, L. Tumiati, Julieta Lazarte, Liza Grossman-Rimon, Filio Billia, Ren‐Ke Li, Vivek Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSulforaphaneTransplantationReperfusion injuryOxidative stressSuperoxide dismutaseApoptosisHeart transplantationPharmacologyIn vivoSalineIschemiaAndrologyInternal medicineCancer researchBiochemistryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Oxidative stress plays a critical role in mediating tissue injury and cellular apoptosis during ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Nrf2 is a transcription factor regulating antioxidant defenses by inducing phase II enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD). However, there are few studies investigating its role in heart transplantation (HTx). In this study, we examined the protective potential of Nrf2 and the Nrf2 inducer, Sulforaphane (SFN), against IRI using a murine neck HTx model. Methods: (1) in vitro study: We treated human coronary artery smooth muscle cells (HCASMC) with 25uM SFN for 24 hours and evaluated Nrf2 expression as well as whole cell SOD activity. (2) in vivo study: We gave 25mg/kg SFN on C57BL/6J wild-type (WT) and Nrf2 knockout (KO) mice, and measured Nrf2 expression and mitochondrial SOD activity on their hearts. (3) HTx study: WT mice were used as recipients, and WT and KO mice were used as donors. 25mg/kg SFN or saline were injected 1 day prior to surgery and after surgery. Donor hearts were perfused with 25uM SFN or saline and stored in the solution for 2 hours to induce IRI. Echocardiography was done after 24 hours reperfusion. Results: (1) SFN induced Nrf2 on HCASMC (1181.5±68.1 % control, p<0.01, n=4). SFN also increased whole cell SOD activity (112.5±2.93 vs 29.9±1.25 U/mg protein in control, p<0.01, n=4) (2) SFN induced Nrf2 in WT after 2 hours of injection (161.1±5.8 % control, p<0.01, n=4). SFN also increased mitochondrial SOD activity in WT after 24 hours of injection. However, this upregulation was absent in KO (Figure1). (3) The %FAC of donor hearts was significantly higher in WT-SFN than WT-Saline after 24 hours reperfusion. KO-Saline and KO-SFN showed similarly lower %FAC than WT (Figure2). Conclusion: Our results suggested that Nrf2 protects against ischemia-reperfusion injury in heart transplantation. The Nrf2 inducer Sulforaphane may represent novel therapy to prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury in heart transplantation. ![][1] [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207