MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Three cyclin‐dependent kinases preferentially phosphorylate different parts of the C‐terminal domain of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II

2004· article· en· W1593333678 on OpenAlexafffund
Reena Grittle Pinhero, Peter S. Liaw, Kimberly A. Bertens, Krassimir Yankulov

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Biochemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Genomics InstituteOntario Genomics
KeywordsCTDCyclin-dependent kinaseRNA polymerase IIKinasePhosphorylationBiologyC-terminusCell biologyCyclin-dependent kinase 7Protein subunitCyclin-dependent kinase 9Molecular biologyBiochemistryProtein kinase ACyclin-dependent kinase 2Cell cycleGenePromoterGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II plays critical roles in the initiation, elongation and processing of primary transcripts. These activities are at least partially regulated by the phosphorylation of the CTD by three cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDKs), namely CDK7, CDK8 and CDK9. In this study, we systematically compared the phosphorylation of different recombinant CTD substrates by recombinant CDK7/CycH/MAT1, CDK8/CycC and CDK9/CycT1 kinases. We showed that CDK7, CDK8 and CDK9 produce different patterns of phosphorylation of the CTD. CDK7/CycH/MAT1 generates mostly hyperphosphorylated full-length and truncated CTD peptides, while CDK8/CycC and CDK9/CycT1 generate predominantly hypophosphorylated peptides. Total activity towards different parts of the CTD also differs between the three kinases; however, these differences did not correlate with their ability to hyperphosphorylate the substrates. The last 10 repeats of the CTD can act as a suppressor of the activity of the kinases in the context of longer peptides. Our results indicate that the three kinases possess different biochemical properties that could reflect their actions in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of BiochemistrySame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207