MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1593677382 · doi:10.54648/erpl2015029

Supply Chain Liability of Multinational Corporations?

2015· article· en· W1593677382 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTortSubsidiaryHarmLiabilityMultinational corporationSupply chainBusinessPolitical scienceWelfare economicsHumanitiesLawLaw and economicsSociologyEconomicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Recent years have seen numerous disasters in factories in countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan that produce goods, in particular garments, for retailers in industrialized countries without being part of their corporate structures. This article raises the question of whether and under what circumstances those retailers may still incur tort law liability for incidents in their supply chains. First discussing concepts of liability for third parties and of organizational torts, this article shows that courts have cautiously moved away from the dogma of strict separation of responsibilities between parent companies and subsidiaries towards a tort law based focus on liability based on control. On that basis, it argues that under suitable circumstances, this approach can also be applied to supply chains, which would impose a duty on retailers to organize their supply chains so as to avoid harm caused by their suppliers. Résumé: De nombreuses catastrophes ont eu lieu ces dernières années dans des usines situées dans des pays comme le Bangladesh et le Pakistan et qui fabriquent des marchandises, en particulier des vêtements, pour des détaillants de pays industrialisés, sans faire toutefois partie de leurs structures de sociétés. Cet article pose la question de savoir si et dans quelles circonstances ces détaillants peuvent encore encourir une responsabilité civile pour des accidents survenus dans leurs chaînes de production. L'article traite d'abord des concepts de responsabilité pour autrui et des délits civils organisationnels, et indique ensuite que les tribunaux ont prudemment quitté le dogme de la stricte séparation des responsabilités entre les sociétés mères et les filiales pour s'orienter vers une responsabilité civile basée sur le contrôle. Sur cette base, il indique que dans des circonstances adéquates, cette approche peut aussi s'appliquer aux chaînes de production et imposerait une obligation de la part des détaillants d'organiser leurs chaîne de production de telle manière à éviter un préjudice causé par leurs fournisseurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it