MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1593948749 · doi:10.22329/jtl.v8i2.3127

Leading Inquiry-based Learning

2012· article· en· W1593948749 on OpenAlex
Jo Towers, E. Lisa Panayotidis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Teaching and Learning · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Critical Thinking Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrincipal (computer security)CurriculumPresentation (obstetrics)PedagogyWork (physics)Inquiry-based learningMathematics educationSociologyPsychologyEngineeringComputer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article focuses on the role of the school principal in curriculum leadership for inquiry-based learning. Drawing on data collected in a study of inquiry-based teaching and learning in an elementary school in a large Canadian city, and in particular on interviews with the school principal, we explore the important role of the principal in leading and sustaining inquiry in schools. We organise our presentation around three significant themes that emerged from our analysis: (1) the role of the principal’s prior experience of inquiry-based teaching and learning practices, (2) explicating the nature of the work of the principal in leading inquiry-based teaching and the dilemmas of that work, and (3) the (principally systemic) elements of the educational working environment that detract from efforts to enact and sustain inquiry in schools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it