MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1594046035

Evaluating the Performance Impact of Dynamic Handle Lookup in Modern Network Interfaces

2003· article· en· W1594046035 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Azimi, Angelos Bilas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheEmbedded systemDistributed computingOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract — Recent work in low-latency, high-bandwidth communication systems has resulted in building user–level Network Interface Controllers (NICs) and communication abstractions that support direct access from the NIC to applications virtual memory to avoid both data copies and operating system intervention. Such mechanisms require the ability to directly manipulate user–level communication buffers for delivering data and achieving protection. To provide such abilities, NICs must maintain appropriate translation data structures. Most user–level NICs manage these data structures statically which results both in high memory requirements for the NIC and limitations on the total size and number of communication buffers that a NIC can handle. In this paper, we categorize the types of data structures used by NICs and proposedynamichandlelookup as a mechanism to manage such data structures dynamically. We implement our approach in a modern, user–level communication system, we evaluate our design with both micro-benchmarks and real applications, and we study the impact of various cache parameters on system performance. In this work we focus mostly on the results of our work. We find that, with appropriate cache tuning, our approach reduces the amount of NIC memory required in our system by a factor of two for the total NIC memory and by more than 80 % for the lookup data structures. For larger system configurations the gains can be even more significant. Moreover, our approach eliminates the limitations imposed by current NICs on the amount of host memory that can be used for communication buffers. Our approach increases execution time by at most 3 % for all but one applications we examine. I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207