Pilomatricoma: Experience of The Hospital for Sick Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pilomatricoma (calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe) is a common skin neoplasm in the pediatric population that is often misdiagnosed as other skin conditions or tumours. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present retrospective study was to review the clinical and histopathological presentation of this neoplasm in children. METHODS: The records of the pathology department at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, were searched for all cases of pilomatricoma between 2001 and 2006. The records of these patients were reviewed to determine sex, age, location and size of the tumour, pathological features and recurrence rate. All patients underwent surgical excision of the lesions. RESULTS: A total of 93 lesions in 85 patients were identified. The median age was 8.7 years. Of the 85 patients diagnosed with pilomatricoma, 44 (52%) were female. In all cases, the initial presentation was an asymptomatic, slow growing, superficial hard mass with bluish discolouration. The most common sites of occurrence were the face (48%), neck (21%) and upper limbs (18%). The size of the surgical specimens collected ranged from 0.1 cm to 2.6 cm. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological examination in all cases. Ghost cells and basaloid cells were described in most of the cases (83%). There were no recurrences in this series. CONCLUSIONS: This entity should be considered with other benign or malignant conditions in the clinical differential diagnosis of solitary firm skin nodules, especially those on the face, neck and upper limbs. The diagnosis can generally be made by clinical examination. The treatment of choice is surgical excision, and the recurrence rate is very low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".