MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pilomatricoma: Experience of The Hospital for Sick Children

2007· article· en· W1594219919 on OpenAlex
Tatiana Karine Simon Cypel, V. Vijayasekaran, Gino R. Somers

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic Surgery · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer and Skin Lesions
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPilomatricomaMedicineAsymptomaticPilomatrixomaPathologicalSurgeryPresentation (obstetrics)Differential diagnosisSkin tumorPopulationDermatologyCancerPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pilomatricoma (calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe) is a common skin neoplasm in the pediatric population that is often misdiagnosed as other skin conditions or tumours. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present retrospective study was to review the clinical and histopathological presentation of this neoplasm in children. METHODS: The records of the pathology department at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, were searched for all cases of pilomatricoma between 2001 and 2006. The records of these patients were reviewed to determine sex, age, location and size of the tumour, pathological features and recurrence rate. All patients underwent surgical excision of the lesions. RESULTS: A total of 93 lesions in 85 patients were identified. The median age was 8.7 years. Of the 85 patients diagnosed with pilomatricoma, 44 (52%) were female. In all cases, the initial presentation was an asymptomatic, slow growing, superficial hard mass with bluish discolouration. The most common sites of occurrence were the face (48%), neck (21%) and upper limbs (18%). The size of the surgical specimens collected ranged from 0.1 cm to 2.6 cm. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological examination in all cases. Ghost cells and basaloid cells were described in most of the cases (83%). There were no recurrences in this series. CONCLUSIONS: This entity should be considered with other benign or malignant conditions in the clinical differential diagnosis of solitary firm skin nodules, especially those on the face, neck and upper limbs. The diagnosis can generally be made by clinical examination. The treatment of choice is surgical excision, and the recurrence rate is very low.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it