Modulation of Mutagen-Induced Genotoxicity by two Lesotho Medicinal Plants in Allium cepa L
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methanolic extracts (mg mL-1) of Dicoma anomala (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25), Chenopodium album (0.078, 0.156, 0.313), used in traditional medicine in Lesotho, and Camellia sinensis (0.1094, 0.2085, 0.44) were assessed for cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and modulation of Cyclophosphamide (CP 1.25 mg mL-1) - and EMS (0.25 mg mL-1)-induced genotoxicity using the Allium cepa assay following 24 hours treatment. Cytotoxicity was measured by the mitotic index (MI). Genotoxicity (GT) was expressed as the number of aberrant mitotic cells per 100 mitotic cells. The MI and GT of test groups (triplicates), were compared with the negative (water) control group using t-test. Modulatory effect (ME) was calculated as, ME(%) = (1-(A-B)/(A-C) × 100) -1. A positive ME indicated an increase (synergism or potentiation) while a negative ME indicated a reduction (anti-genotoxicity) of mutagen-induced genotoxicity. The concentrations of D. anomala extract were cytotoxic and genotoxic. Mixtures of CP or EMS with the lower concentrations of D. anomala extract were more genotoxic than CP (250.50% increase) or EMS (149.74 and 157.37 % increase) or extracts alone. Only 0.313 mg mL-1 of C. album extract was cytotoxic but none of the three concentrations was genotoxic. Mixtures of CP with extracts of C.album were cytotoxic. CP-induced genotoxicity was reduced (55.18, 68.36, 57.40 %) and EMS-induced genotoxicity was also reduced by low concentrations (50.72, 61.13 %) of C.album extract. However, 0.313 mg mL-1 C. album extract increased (236.75%) EMS-induced genotoxicity. C. sinensis extracts and their mixtures with CP were not cytotoxic or genotoxic. CP-induced genotoxicity was reduced (63.61, 66.62, 78.64 %) but EMS-induced genotoxicity was increased (124.97, 4.48, 110.52 %) by C. sinensis extract.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".