MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1594480591

Insights from Scientific Drilling on Rifted Continental Margins

2001· article· en· W1594480591 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Keith E. Louden, Helen Lau

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyContinental marginDrillingRiftMantle (geology)VolcanoPaleontologyContinental crustContinental shelfMargin (machine learning)Passive marginGeomorphologyTectonicsOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sampling of sedimentary and crustal formations across rifted continental margins has long been a priority of DSDP, ODP, and other scientific ocean drilling. Recent results of drilling and related geophysical surveys across several margin segments in the North Atlantic have revealed that continents break apart in two fundamentally different ways. Volcanic margins form when rapid mantle up-welling produces a large amount of melt just prior to and during rifting. On non-volcanic margins, slow rates of rifting the continental crust expose regions of serpentinized mantle with little evidence of melting. Sampling, however, has thus far been restricted to regions of thin sediment cover, which has limited our ability to study the full range of rifted margin evolution. The next phase of scientific drilling will have enhanced capabilities that will allow drilling of both shallow- and deep-water basins, including those with thick sediments with hydrocarbon potential, such as the outer Grand Banks and Scotian margins. To make this a reality, it will be essential to combine both industry and academic interests and work to ensure continued Canadian participation. Resume L'echantillonnage des formations sedimentaires et crustales a travers les marges continentales divergentes, a longtemps ete une priorite pour le DSDP, l'ODP et d'autres projets scientifiques de forages oceaniques. De recents resultats de forages et de leves geophysiques concomitants a travers plusieurs segments de marges en Amerique du Nord ont montre que les continents se fragmentent de deux facons fondamentalement differentes. Des marges volcaniques se forment lorsque des remontees mantelliques entrainent l'accumulation de forts volumes de roches fondues juste avant et durant la distension crustale. Sur les marges non-volcaniques, de faibles taux de distension crustale devoilent des regions de nature mantellique serpentinisees montrant peu d'indices de fusion. Mais, jusqu'a present, l'echantillonnage a ete limite aux regions au couvert sedimentaire mince, ce qui ne nous a pas permis d'etudier la gamme complete de l'evolution des marges de divergence. La prochaine phase de forage scientifique sera pourvue d'un equipement ameliore permettant de forer aussi bien les bassins d'eaux peu profondes que profondes, dont ceux a fortes epaisseurs sedimentaires et comportant un potentiel d'hydrocarbures comme ceux des marges des Grands bancs et de la marge ecossaise. Pour y arriver, il faudra que l'industrie et le secteur academique travaillent de concert pour assurer la continuation d'une participation canadienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207