MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The γ‐glutamylcysteine synthetase gene of Leishmania is essential and involved in response to oxidants

2009· article· en· W1594524376 on OpenAlexafffund
Angana Mukherjee, Gaétan Roy, Chantal Guimond, Marc Ouellette

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyMutantGlutathionePlasmidGeneGlutathione synthetaseNull alleleWild typeBiochemistryGeneticsLeishmaniaMolecular biologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase, encoded by the GSH1 gene, is the rate-limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis of glutathione and of trypanothione in Leishmania. The importance of GSH1 was assessed by generating GSH1 null mutants in Leishmania infantum. Removal of even a single wild-type allelic copy of GSH1 invariably led to the generation of an extra copy of GSH1, maintaining two intact wild-type alleles. However, by first supplementing the parasites with a rescue plasmid, we succeeded in obtaining both a single and null chromosomal GSH1 mutants. Parasites with one intact GSH1 chromosomal allele lost the rescuing plasmid but not the double knockout, when grown in the absence of antibiotic, indicating the essentiality of the GSH1 gene in Leishmania. Heterozygous mutants with one allele-inactivated transcribed less GSH1 mRNA and synthesized less glutathione and trypanothione. These mutants were more susceptible to oxidative stresses in vitro as promastigotes and showed decreased survival inside activated macrophages producing reactive oxygen or nitrogen species. These mutants showed a significant decreased survival in the presence of antimony (SbV) compared with control cells. All phenotypes were reverted in the add-back mutant, thus proving the importance of thiols in dealing with oxidants including the action of antimonials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicResearch on Leishmaniasis StudiesFrench-language works237,207