MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1594713387

Writers, Readers, and Reputations: Literary Life in Britain 1870-1918

2007· article· en· W1594713387 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William Baker

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilological quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCONTESTReading (process)HistoryMovie theaterLiteratureMedia studiesArt historyArtSociologyLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Writers, Readers, and Reputations: Literary Life in Britain 1870-1918 Philip Waller. Oxford U. Press, 2006. Pp. xii + 1181. $192.50 cloth; $60 paper. This is massive book, 9.8 x 6.7 x 2.5 inches in dimension and weighing 5.65 pounds. Its author, Philip Waller, teaches history; Fellow and Tutor at Merton College, Oxford, he is editor of eminent English Historical Review. Waller observes in his Preface that his conjures up aspects of literary life in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century England. period is important as it witnessed rise of a genuine mass-market for literature ... and with it phenomenon of best-seller. Waller adds, authors' behaviour and standing, publics' responses, and images created, are uniting themes of what follows (vii). His book is divided into four sections. first, The Reading World, opens with chapter on film industry, which emerged just before 1914-18 war that Waller insists, in rather outmoded manner, on referring to throughout as the Great War. He writes that by time of Great War, and development of cinema, telephone, and wireless, audio-visual communication was ready to fetter written word and to contest its supremacy over imagination (3). Following the Great War it became commonplace for bestselling authors to be hired to write film scenarios, adapting their own or another's work, or commissioned to produce new story for screen. Waller instances case of W. Somerset Maugham, whose Explorer (1907) was filmed in 1915 and his plays Smith (1909) and Land of Promise (1913-14) in 1917, citing Maugham's quip: horror mitigated only fifteen thousand dollars (15). Many other authors are instanced throughout. Of course there are bound to be omissions. A particularly noteworthy one is Leonard Merrick (1864-1939). Between 1888, date of publication of his first novel Mr. Bazelgette's Agent, and 1911 when his last novel, Position of Peggy Harper, was published, Merrick wrote nine other novels, innumerable short stories, and collaborated in writing of at least eight plays. Between 1918 and 1919 eminent London publishers Hodder and Stoughton published an edition of Merrick's work, and distinguished writers contributed introductions to each title. professionals praising fellow professional, rare event in highly competitive business replete with egotists, include Sir James Barrie, Sir Arthur Wing Pinero, Neil Munro, Maurice Hewlett, Harley Granville Barker, and G. K. Chesterton. With exception of Glasgow-based novelist and working journalist Neil Munro (1864-1930), all are mentioned somewhere in Waller's pages. Merrick's case is especially pertinent, however, to Waller's opening chapter. Merrick appears to have been an exception rather than rule in sense that he gave up writing novels. After 1911 he concentrated his creative energies on writing short stories for high-paying magazines primarily based in United States, and subsequently cashed in on emerging motion-picture industry. earlier of three film versions of Merrick's drama Impostor, written with Michael Morton, another writer not mentioned within Waller's canvas, was released in United States in January 1918. An early Cecil B. DeMille production was Fool's Paradise, loosely adapted from Merrick's quasi-autobiographical short story set in South African goldfield of Kimberley, The Laurels and Lady, released in 1921. A year earlier Merrick's novel Conrad in Quest of His Youth had been released as silent film directed Cecil B. DeMille's elder brother, William C. DeMille. Waller's second chapter, Consenting and Dissenting Bibliophiles in Public and Private, returns to period when still held pride of place among pre-1914 entertainments (17). In order to illustrate mania for reading he draws upon wide range of contemporary recollection and evidence. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilological quarterlySame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207