MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W159487391

Creating Healthy, Sustainable Infant and Toddler Environments

2010· article· en· W159487391 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vicki L. Stoecklin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToddlerSafeguardingPsychologyMedicineEnvironmental healthPediatricsDevelopmental psychologyNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beginning in the womb, babies and toddlers are more vulnerable to environmental toxins. Pound for pound, children breathe more air, drink more water and eat more than adults. Their brains and neurological systems are still developing during the first three years and often times they are placed on the floor where chemicals are commonly used. Infants and toddlers are orally stimulated so many items in their environments go into their mouths. While many resources have been developed to help early educators understand how to set up the physical environments of infants and toddlers, few resources have been created to assist early educators in safeguarding children’s health. This article will outline the considerations for creating healthier infant/toddler environments. Early Educator Functions Sleeping Sleeping is one of the most important developmental tasks that infants and toddlers do on a daily basis. While the body rests during sleep, it is also during this time that the brain is undergoing massive changes and growth. Infants usually sleep in cribs while toddlers sleep on cots. A careful selection of these furniture pieces will better assure that naptime is healthy too. Many crib mattresses are made of foam that has been drenched in toxic flameretardants. This is a requirement by fire officials in many provinces in Canada and some states in the US. The mattress is then covered with a plastic cover. Choose a firm three to four inch mattress covered in plastic that is not made of poly vinyl coated (PVC) plastic which is toxic. Be sure that the mattress or its cover does not have any holes or punctures in the cover that could leak toxic chemicals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.013
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207