Cervical implantation of intrathecal baclofen pump catheter in children with severe scoliosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECT: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pump catheter placement is traditionally performed through entry into the spinal sac at the lumbar spine. A minority of children with cerebral palsy have severe concomitant neuromuscular scoliosis. In these children, whether surgically treated or not, access to the intradural space via the lumbar spine may prove technically challenging. The authors report on a series of children in whom, for various reasons, an ITB catheter was implanted using a posterior cervical spine approach. METHODS: The records of 20 children in whom a baclofen catheter had been placed were retrospectively reviewed to assess the demographic details, indications, and outcome of this procedure. RESULTS: This approach was successful in all but one of the children in whom the procedure was abandoned given the presence of significant extradural scar tissue. Of the 20 children, 7 had previously undergone lumbar ITB catheter implantation, although the catheter was subsequently, iatrogenically transected during scoliosis surgery. Nine children had had corrective scoliosis surgery, and the fusion mass obviated access to the lumbar spinal sac. Four children had untreated scoliosis and corrective surgery was being contemplated. Complications included infection requiring explantation (2 patients), catheter migration (1 patient), intolerance to ITB (1 patient), and failure of implantation (1 patient). All patients who tolerated the ITB experienced improvement in spasticity. No complications were associated with the spinal level of catheter insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of an ITB catheter via a cervical approach is safe and feasible and should be considered in children with severe corrected or uncorrected scoliosis, and thus avoiding the lumbar spinal sac.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".