Genetics and Innate and Adaptive Immunity in IBD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an abnormal inflammatory response within the gut to a trigger that has yet to be identified. The family history in many patients, especially those with Crohn's disease, suggests a genetic predisposition. It has been hypothesized that the abnormal inflammatory response is due in part to genetic alterations in the normal homeostatic processes that regulate host interactions with the normal gut microbes. Genetic studies have identified increasing numbers of genetic risk factors that involve a diverse series of pathways such as receptors of innate immune response, defects in epithelial barrier function, immune- and cytokine-related genes and genes involved in autophagy. Studies further suggest that abnormal immune responses in IBD patients are directed against the intestinal microbiota, with activation of both innate and adaptive immune responses. Indeed, studies have shown bacterial-derived antigen as drivers of T cell immune responses. More recently, Th17, regulatory T cells and unconventional innate-like T cells have been implicated in the induction and regulation of intestinal inflammation. The seminal discoveries of pathogen recognition receptors including Toll-like receptors and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain receptors have changed our understanding of how immune cells respond to microbes and the role this may play in IBD pathogenesis. Understanding these mechanism will lead to new strategies in the treatment and prevention of IBD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".