MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596367889 · doi:10.1186/1748-7161-10-s1-o39

Curve flexibility assessment on AIS surgical candidates using ultrasonic imaging method - a preliminary study

2015· article· en· W1596367889 on OpenAlexaff
Edmond Lou, Rui Zheng, Lawrence H. Le, Doug Hill, Jim Raso, Douglas Hedden, James Mahood, Marc Moreau

Bibliographic record

VenueScoliosis · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsAlberta HealthUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronal planeFlexibility (engineering)RadiographyUltrasoundMeasure (data warehouse)ScoliosisMedical physicsSurgical planningUltrasonographyRadiologyNuclear medicineSurgeryComputer scienceData miningMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bending radiographs are routinely used to determine curve flexibility during planning of scoliosis surgery. However, the cumulative dose of ionizing radiation is a concern, especially in growing children. Ultrasound (US) imaging method has been used to measure the coronal curvatures up to 45° Cobb. The objectives were to investigate the feasibility of using US method to scan AIS surgical candidates, to measure the curve flexibility and to determine its correspondence with the radiographic measures. Four female AIS surgical candidates (age: 14.6±1.6 years) consented to participate. Both radiographs and US images, in standing, left bending and right bending positions, were obtained prior to scoliosis surgery. Routine supine bending radiographs for surgical planning were assessed, whereas the US was acquired in the prone position. The post-op standing radiographs were acquired one week after the surgery. One rater blinded to the clinical information measured the curvature with one week apart between modalities. Eight curves, 4 right thoracic, 1 thoracolumbar and 3 lumbar curves, were measured. The curve correction angles were calculated by subtracting the bending curves from the standing Cobb angles. The mean absolute deviation (MAD), standard deviation (SD) and correlation coefficient (R) of the correction angles between the US images and radiographs were compared. The pre-op Cobb angles from standing radiographs and ultrasound images were 53±16° and 49±16°, respectively. The correction angles (MAD±SD) measured from the bending radiographs, bending ultrasound and the post-op radiographs were 31±8°, 39±10°, and 31±9°. The (MAD±SD and R) of the correction angles between the bending radiographs versus the post-op radiographs, and the bending ultrasound versus the post-op radiographs were (9±4°, 0.34) and (8±6°, 0.83) respectively. Although the overall curve correction was similar between the radiography and ultrasound measurements, the ultrasound measurements showed a higher correlation between the predicted correction and the final outcomes. Ultrasound imaging method has a potential to measure the coronal curvature of the AIS surgical candidate. Although the curve flexibility can be estimated by the US method, the results showed more correction compared to the bending radiography measurements. This may be partially due to the difference in prone and supine bending posture. The correction measurements from the US and post-op measurements presented higher correlation than the measurements between pre-op and post-op radiographs. However, due to a limited number of participants, a definite conclusion cannot yet be made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScoliosisSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207