High-order interpolation schemes for shear instability simulations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the performance of a numerical method for the solution to shallow-water equations on a staggered grid, in simulations for shear instabilities at two convective Froude numbers.Design/methodology/approach: The simulations start from a small perturbation to a base flow with a hyperbolic-tangent velocity profile. The subsequent development of the shear instabilities is studied from the simulations using a number of flux-limiting schemes, including the second-order MINMOD, the third-order ULTRA-QUICK and the fifth-order WENO schemes for the spatial interpolation of the nonlinear fluxes. The fourth-order Runge-Kutta method advances the simulation in time.Findings: The simulations determine two parameters: the fractional growth rate of the linear instabilities; and the vorticity thickness of the first nonlinear peak. Grid refinement using 32, 64, 128, 256 and 512 nodes over one wave length determines the exact values by extrapolation and the computational error for the parameters. It also determines the overall order of convergence for each of the flux-limiting schemes used in the numerical simulations.Originality/valueâ The four-digit accuracy of the numerical simulations presented in this paper are comparable to analytical solutions. The development of this reliable numerical simulation method has paved the way for further study of the instabilities in shear flows that radiate waves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it