Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Steve Clark and Masashi Suzuki Part I: The Orient in Blake: The Global Eighteenth Century 1. International Blake David Worrall, Nottingham Trent University, UK 2. Blake and the Chinamen Mei-Ying Sung National University of Taiwan / Nottingham Trent 3. Colour Printing East and West: Blake and the Ukiyo-e Tradition Minne Tanaka, Nottingham Trent University, UK 4. Blake and Rebekkah Bliss, Collector of Oriental Books Keri Davies, Blake Society / Nottingham Trent University 5. Blake and the Representation of Race in Late 18th Century England Sibylle Erle, Nottingham Trent 6. Black / Blake: Africa and Utopia in the 1790s Susan Matthews, Roehampton University, UK 7. An Empire of Exotic Nature: Blake's Botanic and Zoomorphic Imagery Ashton Nichols, Dickinson College, US 8. Blake and Egypt Kazuya Okada, Okayama University, Japan 9. Blake, Hayley and India Hikari Sato, University of Kobe, Japan 10. Blake, India and Wilkins's translation of the Bhagavad-gita Tristanne Connolly, Waterloo, Ontario PART II: Blake in the Orient: Early Twentieth Century Japanese Reception. 11. Blake's Oriential Heterodoxy: Yanagi's Perception of Blake Ayako Wada, Tottori University, Japan 12. A curious Symmetry between Blake and Yanagi Kazuyoshi Oishi, University of the Air, Japan 13. The Female Voice in Blake Studies, 1910s-1930s Yoko Imalzumi, University of Tsukuba, Japan 14. Yanagi and Jugaku in the Fifteen Years War Shunsuke Tsurumi, Japan 15. The Shirabaka Group and the Early Reception of Blake's Art Work in Japan Yumiko Goto, Kyoto Municipal Museum of Arts 16. Blake and the Young Painters of the Kyoto School Kozo Shioe, Kyoto City University, Japan 17. Self-Annihilation in Milton Hatsuko Nimii, Japan's Women University PART III: Blake in the Orient: Later Responses 18. Blake's Night Thoughts Jeremy Tambling, University of Hong Kong 19. Blake's Reception in Sato and Oe Barnard Turner, National University of Singapore 20. Blake and Oe Kenzaburo Keiko Kobayashi, Ritsumeikan University, Japan 21. Nebuchadnezzar's Sublime Torment: Blake, Arthur Boyd and the East Peter Otto, University of Melbourne, Australia 22. Walking thro' Eternity: Blake's Psychogeography Jason Whittaker, Falmouth, UK 23. Blake's Question John Phillips, University of Singapore 24. Afterword: The Reception of the British Romantics over the Waters Elinor Shaffer, University of London, UK Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".