MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596681812

Effect of intraocular pressure on optic disc topography, electroretinography, and axonal loss in a chronic pressure-induced rat model of optic nerve damage.

2002· article· en· W1596681812 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOphthalmologyIntraocular pressureOptic nerveElectroretinographyMedicineOptic discErgRetinalAnatomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To characterize the effect of intraocular pressure (IOP) on optic disc topography, retinal function, and axonal survival in a model of IOP-induced optic nerve damage in rat. METHODS: Hypertonic (1.75 M) saline was injected into an episcleral vein of one eye of 49 Brown Norway rats, with the fellow untreated eye serving as the control. During the 1 to 3 months of follow-up, IOP was measured twice weekly in conscious animals with a handheld tonometer, and changes in disc topography and retinal function were monitored with scanning laser tomography and electroretinography (ERG), respectively. Peak IOP elevation in the experimental eye compared with the fellow control eye (peak deltaIOP), integral of IOP elevation over time (deltaIOP integral), and days of IOP elevation were calculated. Axon counts were obtained from electron micrographs of the sectioned optic nerves. RESULTS: Progressive cupping was found in 9 (56.3%) of 16 eyes with peak deltaIOP of more than 15 mm Hg and in none of 21 eyes with peak deltaIOP less than 15 mm Hg. A strong correlation between deltaIOP integral and progressive cupping was also found, but not with days of IOP elevation. ERG abnormalities (limited to the b-wave) were found in 11 (64.7%) of 17 eyes with peak deltaIOP of more than 15 mm Hg and in 2 (8.7%) of 23 eyes with peak deltaIOP of less than 15 mm Hg. Neither of the other IOP parameters was predictive of ERG damage. The proportion of surviving axons was negatively correlated to both deltaIOP and deltaIOP integral (P <or= 0.001). Progressive cupping was evident only with more than 55% axonal loss. Similarly, ERG results remained mostly within normal limits for low to moderate axonal loss, but were markedly abnormal with more than 70% axonal loss. CONCLUSIONS: Structural and functional changes in this model are best correlated to peak deltaIOP and not to duration of IOP elevation, suggesting the existence of an IOP-related damage threshold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it