Relativistic electron precipitation induced by EMIC‐triggered emissions in a dipole magnetosphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We perform test particle simulations of relativistic electrons interacting with electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC)‐triggered emissions in the plasmasphere. EMIC‐triggered emissions are generated by energetic protons injected into the inner magnetosphere. EMIC‐triggered emissions are characterized by large wave amplitudes, rising‐tone frequencies, and coherent left‐hand circularly polarized waves. We study trajectories of relativistic radiation belt electrons drifting eastward interacting with longitudinally distributed EMIC‐triggered emissions. Some electrons are trapped by wave potentials and efficiently guided down to lower pitch angles. Repeated interactions occur due to the mirror motion and result in the scattering of particles into the loss cone. We use two EMIC wave models for the test particle simulations. One assumes that the wave amplitude is constant, and the other assumes a time‐dependent wave amplitude that characterizes subpackets. Both model waves are resonant with 0.5–6.0 MeV electrons and precipitate them. Electrons in the energy range 1.1–3.0 MeV are precipitated most efficiently. Approximately 50% of the total injected number of 1.1–3.0 MeV electrons are precipitated in a timescale of 2 min. We obtain the relativistic electron distribution in equatorial pitch angle and in pitch angle at the atmosphere. Further, we determine the timing and longitudinal location of the relativistic electron precipitation with respect to different particle energies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".