MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1596985946 · doi:10.3138/tric.23.1_2.130

Checklist Addendum 2003: Additions to the 2002 Checklist

2002· article· en· W1596985946 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
David S. Gardner

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAddendumChecklistPleasurePsychologyLibrary scienceComputer sciencePhilosophyCognitive psychologyLinguisticsPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Last spring, in the Volume 22: No.1 issue, I had the pleasure of presenting a Checklist of 248 books by and about Canadian performing artists.This is an addendum of approximately 98 more biographies or autobiographies, either published or discovered since last year (or still 'in the works' for eventual publication). Once again, I welcome corrections and/or additions at my email address: david.gardner@utoronto.ca .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.153
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.153
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0230.017
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2160.149

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre Research in CanadaSame topicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207