Bibliographic record
Abstract
DAVID HEMPTON. Methodism: Empire of the Spirit. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 2005. Pp. xiii + 278, appendix, chronology, bibliography, index. $30.00. David Hempton of Boston University has written an outstanding book on the rise and decline of Methodism, one that should be read care by all historians of the so-called mainline Protestant denominations. Insightful and often iconoclastic, Hempton offers fresh interpretations of some of the most fundamental issues of the Methodist past. His scope is transatlantic, emphases especially on England and the United States. He also includes significant discussions of the other three nations of the British Isles and territories farther afield like Canada and India. His research is deep, wide, and up-to-date. His extensive endnotes feature citations to manuscripts in obscure collections, as well as to twenty-first century books and articles. While not a survey in the strict sense of the term, Hempton's book is essentially a series of linked essays. Among other things, he furnishes new details on the ways in which early Methodists appealed to those who were in some sense marginal, whether geographically, socially, or psychologically. At the same time, Hempton has little patience hagiography and refuses to present John Wesley as a traditional religious hero: Wesley's much vaunted genius for organization turns out upon closer inspection to have been a ragbag of pragmatic innovations borrowed from Moravians and Quakers, or suggested to him by other free-market itinerant evangelists, most of whom he later fought with (16). When discussing anti-Methodist attacks, Hempton arrives at the unusual but sensible conclusion that opposition served to energize early Methodists and that it as much enabler as it was destroyer of the Methodist cause (99). To elucidate Methodist finances (109-30), he uses the analogy of a business organization and points out that recurring deficits were not too problematic when rapid expansion was occurring. Then, as expansion slowed and the number of religious projects multiplied, financial problems could become acute. This provides yet another explanation, one typically not adduced, for the dominance of wealthy Methodists in the mature Methodist movement. Hempton provides a fresh analysis of the decline of Methodism in the twentieth century, a topic which is not well represented in current Methodist historiography. After reading his critical discussion of various theories of religious decline, this reviewer was drawn to the rather simple conclusion that popular new religious movements almost inevitably follow an arc-like trajectory of growth and contraction, and that Methodism was no exception. While impressively complex and subtle, Hempton's views ultimately do not seem to offer more than embellishments and qualifications to this simple description. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".