Nonlinear Optics in Confined Structures for a Better Understanding of Vacuum Field Fluctuations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The confinement of light between two highly reflective mirrors, the so‐called optical microcavities, can lead to very interesting novel effects. It is well known that the resonant recirculation of light inside a microcavity can be used to study the strong coupling of light waves with nonlinear materials. Under these confinement conditions, nonlinear optical effects like second harmonic generation, parametric fluorescence, and so on, become more easily observable. Microcavities can also be used to investigate vacuum quantum fluctuation, i.e. the temporary appearance of particle‐antiparticle pairs out of nothing allowed by the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. In such confined media, the fluctuating quantum states can be manipulated and intensified at specific wavelength by properly selecting the size of the microcavity resonator. In this work, we give an overview of the research done by our team using microcavities. We also discuss how these microcavities are fabricated using Bragg mirrors obtained from direct current magnetron sputtering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".