An Archival Revolution: W. Kaye Lamb and the Transformation of the Archival Profession
Bibliographic record
Abstract
W. Kaye Lamb, fourth Dominion Archivist of Canada, 1948–69, as well as its first National Librarian and a prolific historian, ignited an archival revolution in the country. Rejecting many of the ideas of Hilary Jenkinson and most of the approaches of his predecessors, Lamb knew he was establishing in Canada a “new profession” for archivists and a new kind of archives. His revolution to modernize archivy had three major thrusts: enhancing total archives by augmenting more systematic and comprehensive appraisal (and destruction) of records, embracing archival government records and establishing records management, and significantly expanding researcher services and public programming. All were driven by his desire for “keeping the past up to date” to meet the pressing cultural needs of the country, and to support the postwar creation of an efficient modern state. The archives that Lamb inspired – and his ideas underpinning them – form the backdrop for much of the intense debate of the past three decades about the nature of the archival profession and its functions. Understanding Lamb’s ideas thus sheds light on the profession’s present and future directions, as well as celebrate one of its historical giants. This study is based on Lamb’s own writings and personal papers, including first-time access to an extensive unpublished memoir of his archival career.RÉSUMÉ W. Kaye Lamb, qui fut le quatrième Archiviste fédéral du Canada de 1948 à 1969 ainsi que le premier Bibliothécaire national et un historien prolifique, a déchaîné une révolution archivistique au pays. Rejetant plusieurs des idées d’Hilary Jenkinson et la plupart des approches de ses prédécesseurs, Lamb était conscient d’établir au Canada une nouvelle profession pour les archivistes et une nouvelle vision des archives. Cette modernisation a eu trois principales directions : mettre l’accent sur les archives totales en renforçant l’évaluation (et la destruction) systématique et exhaustive des documents, s’attaquer aux documents d’archives du gouvernement et y établir la gestion des documents et, enfin, étendre de façon significative les services aux chercheurs et le programme public. Tous ces projets étaient soutenus par le désir de Lamb de « garder le passé au goût du jour » afin de satisfaire les besoins culturels pressants du pays et de soutenir la création après la guerre d’un état moderne efficace. La vision des archives inspirée par Lamb – et les idées qui sont sous-jacentes – forment la toile de fond de l’intense débat dans les trois dernières décennies sur la nature de la profession d’archiviste et ses fonctions. Mieux comprendre les idées de Lamb permet donc de jeter la lumière sur le présent de notre profession et ses directions futures ainsi que de célébrer un des ses géants historiques. Cet article est fondé sur les écrits et les documents personnels de W. Kaye Lamb, entre autres sur un mémoire non-publié sur sa carrière historique auquel l’auteur a pu acéder pour la première fois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".