Unusual double pituitary adenoma: A case report
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the case of a 60-year-old woman with Cushing disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large sellar and suprasellar mass involving the right cavernous sinus, consistent with pituitary macroadenoma. It was resected by transsphenoidal surgery. Light microscopy revealed two separate pituitary adenomas with different histologic and immunohistochemical features. One was amphophilic and strongly Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) positive, the other chromophobic and PAS negative. The former tumor was immunopositive for adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH); approximately 30% tumor cells were immunopositive for MGMT (O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyl-Transferase). The second tumor was a PAS negative, luteinizing hormone (LH) and alpha subunit immunopositive gonadotroph adenoma. In this tumor, about 90% of the cells were immunopositive for MGMT. The Ki-67 nuclear indices of the two tumors were 6% and 2%. Our case represents a rare combination of two morphologically different pituitary adenomas, one producing ACTH and the other LH and alpha subunit. The two tumors differed not only in Ki-67 labeling indices but in MGMT immunoexpression as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it