MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1597785131

Experimental study of propeller-aircraft run-up noise

2001· article· en· W1597785131 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Pierre Germain, Jignan Guo, Murray Hodgson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Noise and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)AcousticsDirectivityAircraft noisePropellerInsertion lossFence (mathematics)Environmental scienceEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringMarine engineeringComputer scienceNoise reductionStructural engineeringAntenna (radio)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurements were made of the characteristics of the noise radiated by a Beechcraft 1900D twin-propeller aircraft during engine run-up.The objective was to determine the feasibility of controlling this noise using active noise control.Total noise levels varied with aircraft heading from 103 to 112 dB (100 to 109 dBA) at 73 m from the aircraft.Noise directivity plots were generated.Levels at the nearest community 3 km away varied from 74 to 77 dB (62 to 66 dBA).Near the aircraft the noise spectra comprised a series of equally-high peaks at the 112-Hz fundamental frequency and its multiples.In the community, the three low est peaks dominated the A-weighted spectrum, with higher-frequency peaks being progressively attenuated.A coherence analysis was performed on the noises measured at 73 m and 98 m from the aircraft.The inser tion loss of a blast fence near the run-up area was estimated from run-up noise measurements made on both sides of the fence.The insertion loss varied from 4 to 13 dB and was greatest at mid frequencies. SOMMAIREDes mesures ont t faites des caractristiques du brait rayonn par un avion deux hlices -un Beechcraft 1900D -durant des tests d'acclration des moteurs ('run-up').L'objectif a t de dterminer s'il serait fais able de controller ce brait par un systme de contrle actif.Les niveaux totals du brait ont varis avec la direction de 103 112 dB (de 100 109 dBA) 73 m de l'avion.La directivit du bruit rayonn a t dter mine.Dans la communaut voisine la plus proche, environ 3 km de l'avion, les niveaux ont varis entre 62 et 66 dBA.Proche de l'avion, le spectre du brait a consist d'une srie d'arrts d'amplitudes semblables correspondant la frquence fondamentale de 112 Hz et de ses harmoniques.Dans la communaut voisine, les trois arrts les plus bas ont domins le spectre; les arrts de plus hautes frquences ont ts de plus en plus attnus.Un analyse de cohrence a t faite sur les bruits mesurs 73 m et 98 m de l'avion.La perte par insertion d'une clture acoustique proche du site de test, estime l'aide de mesures prises des deux cts de la clture, a varie de 4 13 dB et a te le plus lve moyenne frquence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicVehicle Noise and Vibration ControlFrench-language works237,207