MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

American Physical Therapy Association-Credentialed Clinical Instructors: A Survey Regarding Source of Motivation for Pursuing Credentialing

2012· article· en· W159784658 on OpenAlex
Kimberly W. Coleman-Ferreira, Lynn A. Millar, Ronald Fogg, Adriel R. King

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Therapy Education · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Canadian institutionsKimberly-Clark (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCredentialingCredentialLikert scalePsychologyMedical educationAssociation (psychology)MedicineComputer sciencePsychotherapistDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose. The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) promotes clinical education credentialing for clinical instructors (CIs) through the Clinical Instructor Education and Credentialing Program (CIECP). APTA reports that since the program's inception, 34,657 CIs have received Basic CIECP credentialing status, which represents less than half of APTA's membership, and an unknown percentage of non-APTA members. To date, it is not known what motivates CIs to pursue credentialing, or if the motivation is more intrinsically or extrinsically driven. The purpose of this study was to determine the source of the motivational factors for physical therapist CIs who have pursued credentialing by APTA. Subjects. The subjects included 2,209 APTA-credentialed physical therapist CIs distributed throughout the United States. Methods. A pilot form of the survey was used to gain feedback from local credentialed CIs to establish face and content validity. Credentialed CIs were sent an email link to a 3-section survey. The first section consisted of demographic questions, while the second section consisted of 7-point Likert scale questions pertaining to intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation for becoming credentialed. Finally, the last section was forced choice questions also pertaining to motivational factors. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare all responses in section 2 between the intrinsic and extrinsic oriented questions, with paired t tests to determine specific question response differences. Results. Analysis revealed significant differences favoring intrinsic motivation. The 2 most significant intrinsic factors included contribution to the education of student physical therapists (SPTs) and professional development. Within the open-ended section of the survey more than 50% of the respondents reported intrinsic motivational reasons for becoming APTA Basic CIECP CIs. Discussion and Conclusion. Results from both the close-ended and forcedchoice questions demonstrate that the driving forces behind a CI obtaining APTA credentialing are intrinsic. The primary intrinsic motivators were professional development and personal satisfaction of helping educate students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.546
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it