Effects of neonatal ventral hippocampal lesion in rats on stress‐induced acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Excitotoxic neonatal ventral hippocampus (NVH) lesions in rats result in characteristic post-pubertal hyper-responsiveness to stress and cognitive abnormalities analogous to those described in schizophrenia and suggestive of alterations in dopamine (DA) neurotransmission. Converging lines of evidence also point to dysfunctions in the cortical cholinergic system in neuropsychiatric disorders. In previous studies, we observed alterations in dopaminergic modulation of acetylcholine (Ach) release in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in post-pubertal NVH-lesioned rats. These two neurotransmitter systems are involved in the stress response as PFC release of DA and Ach is enhanced in response to some stressful stimuli. As adult NVH-lesioned rats are behaviorally more reactive to stress, we investigated the effects of NVH lesions on tail-pinch stress-induced Ach and DA release in the PFC. Using in vivo microdialysis, we observed that tail-pinch stress resulted in significantly greater increases in prefrontal cortical Ach release in post-pubertal NVH-lesioned rats (220% baseline) compared with sham-operated controls (135% baseline). Systemic administration of the D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) or the D2-like receptor antagonist haloperidol (0.2 mg/kg i.p.), as well as intra-PFC administration of the D2-like antagonist sulpiride (100 microm), reduced stress-induced Ach release in PFC of adult NVH-lesioned rats. By contrast, intra-PFC administration of SCH 23390 (100 microm) failed to affect stress-induced Ach release in PFC of NVH-lesioned rats. Interestingly, using in vivo voltammetry, stress-induced stimulation of PFC DA release was found to be attenuated in adult NVH-lesioned rats. Taken together, these data suggest developmentally specific reorganization of prefrontal cortical cholinergic innervation notably regarding its regulation by DA neurotransmission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".