Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Micropaleontology of Pre- and Early-Champlain Sea Fine-Grained Facies from the Foster Sand Pit, Ottawa, Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Foster sand pit exposes pre- to late-Champlain Sea sediments containing 4 litho/biofacies. These are, from oldest to youngest: Faciès 1- cross-stratified sand and diamicton deposited as late-glacial, ice-proximal subaqueous outwash. Faciès 2- laminated silt and clay rhythmites with a sparse Candona cf. C. subtriangulata ostracode fauna deposited in a deep, proglacial lake preceding the Champlain Sea, Fades 3- massive to rarely laminated silty clay with dominant foraminifera Elphidium bartletti, Protelphidium orbiculare and Cassidulina crassa represents the first glaciomarine deposition in Champlain Sea water 30-100 m deep with a paleosalinity of 22-33 %o. Faciès 4- mixed bedding of sand and mud, with a microfossil assemblage dominated by the Elphidium/Protelphidium complex representing an intertidal offlap sequence. Water depths during deposition of Faciès 4 dropped to 10-30 m. and paleosalinity dropped to 18-28 %o.. This study recognizes a pre-Champlain Sea proglacial lake, assigns subaqueous outwash deposits to an earlier time than previously believed and documents changes in bottom water characteristics of the early Champlain Sea based on sedimentary and microfossil evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".