The mental health promotion evaluation form for depressive prevention in elderly in Chiang Rai
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mental health promotion evaluation form for depressive disorders prevention in elderly in Chiang Rai who attended the 3 months trial plan of the form of mental health promotion under local culture. This consisted of Tung tree cutting, prolonging activities and stimulation, Bai Sri Su Khwan, recycling and Tai Chi exercise. This study used a simple random sampling with a list of 36 subject names. The research instruments were the evaluation form under the Ottawa charter for health promotion which consisted of creating a policy for mental health promotion, creating an environment that is conducted to mental health well-being, strengthening the community and stakeholders in mental health promotions, developing personal skills in promoting mental health and modifying a health care system for promoting mental health. To evaluate the satisfaction using this form were determined by 5 experts for the content validity and the results were 0.93. This study found that health promotion form was at a high level with the mean 4.41 (SD = 0.49) and the satisfaction of the elderly who participated in the trial form was at a moderate level with the mean at 3.67 (SD = 0.30). Therefore, the creation process of the form of mental health promotion for depressive disorders prevention in the elderly with severe level based on their social culture, and understanding their distress, happiness and requirements with emphasis on activities promoting health and reducing the risk of depression in these elderly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".