MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1598376461 · doi:10.1002/elps.201400418

Translocation of a polymer through a nanopore starting from a confining nanotube

2014· article· en· W1598376461 on OpenAlexafffund
David Sean, Hendrick W. de Haan, Gary W. Slater

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrophoresis · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNanoporePolymerTube (container)Materials scienceNanotubeLangevin dynamicsChemical physicsTension (geology)NanotechnologyMolecular dynamicsChromosomal translocationCarbon nanotubeMechanicsMolecular physicsComposite materialChemistryPhysicsComputational chemistryStatistical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this manuscript, Langevin Dynamics simulations and Tension-Propagation theory are used to investigate the forced translocation of a polymer from a confining tube through a nanopore situated at one of the tube's ends. The diameter of the tube allows for a control over the polymer conformations: decreasing the tube diameter reduces the number of conformations available to the polymer chain both before and during translocation. As the tube diameter is decreased, the translocation time is observed to increase. Interestingly, while the width of the distribution of translocation times is reduced if the chain starts in a tube, it reaches a maximum for weakly confining tubes. A Tension-Propagation approach is developed for the tube-nanopore setup in the strongly driven limit. Good agreement between the simulations and the theory allows for an exploration of the underlying physical mechanisms, including the calculation of an effective pore friction and the assessing of the impact of monomer crowding on the trans side.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectrophoresisSame topicNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesFrench-language works237,207