Application of direct potential fitting to line position data for the X 1Σ+ and A 1Σ+ states of LiH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A collection of 9089 spectroscopic LiH line positions, of widely varying precision, which sample 84.9% and 98.6% of the A and X state well depths, respectively, have been employed in a direct least-squares fit of the effective potential energy and Born-Oppenheimer breakdown functions for the two states. For the four isotopomers (6)LiH, (7)LiH, (6)LiD, and (7)LiD, the data comprise both pure rotational and vibration-rotational transitions within the ground state, as well as rotationally resolved transitions in the A-X system. Despite the unusual shape and associated anomalous properties of the A state potential, no special features or considerations were required in the direct potential fitting approach. The reduced standard deviation of the fit was close to unity, indicating that the quantum mechanical eigenvalues calculated from the fully analytical functions of the Hamiltonians of the two states, which are characterized by a total of only 53 fitted parameters, represent the line positions, on average, to within the estimated uncertainties. A quantum mechanical calculation of the molecular constants G(nu), B(nu), D(nu), H(nu), L(nu), M(nu), N(nu), and O(nu) from the fitted potential for the A state of (7)LiH confirms that the usual polynomial expansion in J(J+1) is an unsatisfactory representation for the rotational terms of the lowest vibrational levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".