MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1598409319 · doi:10.1002/9781118032480.ch4

Validation: accept, Improve, or Reject

2007· other· en· W1598409319 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcosystem dynamics and resilience
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Rotation (mathematics)PredatorPredationStability (learning theory)Population growthPopulationComputer scienceOperations researchEcologyGeographyEnvironmental scienceSimulationEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsBiologySociologyMachine learningDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: A model of U.S. Population Growth Cleaning Lake Ontario Plant Growth The Speed of a Boat The Extent of Bird Migration The Speed of Cars in a Tunnel The Stability of Cars in a Tunnel The Forest Rotation Time Crop Spraying How Right was Poiseuille? Competing Species Predator–Prey Oscillations Sockeye Swings, Paradigms, and Complexity Optimal Fleet Size and Higher Paradigms On the Advantages of Flexibility in Prescriptive Models

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.081
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.431
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0810.431
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.012
Open science0.0050.007
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1640.122

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEcosystem dynamics and resilienceFrench-language works237,207