MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P4-05-17: Mammaglobin is a potent regulator of breast cancer processes leading to disease progression

2015· article· en· W1598759982 on OpenAlexaff
Roxann Guérrette, Nadia Picot, Gilles A. Robichaud

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetastasis and carcinoma case studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerCancerMedicineMalignancyCancer researchMetastasisRegulatorTumor progressionMammaglobinFocal adhesionInternal medicineOncologySignal transductionBiologyGeneCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metastasis is the major cause of death in women suffering from breast cancer. To provide a better understand breast cancer progression, we have studied the role of mammaglobine-1 (MGB1) gene in breast cancer pathogenesis. MGB1 has been extensively studied as a diagnostic biomarker due to its abundant expression in mammary cancer cells. Yet, MGB1's role in disease progression is still unknown. Our experimental results demonstrate for the first time that MGB1 in a pivotal regulator on breast cancer malignancy. More precisely, loss of MGB1 expression correlates with a decrease in proliferation, spheroid formation, migration, and invasion capacities of breast cancer cells. Concomitantly, we also observe that MGB1 expression activates pro-malignant signaling cascades such as MAPKs, focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and NFkB pathways. Moreover, MGB1 promote epithelial to mesenchymal (EMT) features which coincide with our findings. Our study provides the first evidence for MGB1 as regulator of breast cancer malignancy and disease progression. Citation Format: Roxann Guerrette, Nadia Picot, Gilles Robichaud. Mammaglobin is a potent regulator of breast cancer processes leading to disease progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-05-17.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicMetastasis and carcinoma case studiesFrench-language works237,207