Children with atopic histories exhibit impaired lipopolysaccharide‐induced Toll‐like receptor‐4 signalling in peripheral monocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The hygiene hypothesis states that early exposure to bacterial products such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) may be protective against the development of allergic diseases. Whether atopic disease affects the ability of immune cells to respond to LPS is unclear. Our laboratory has demonstrated previously that children express high levels of Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 on CD4(+) cells in nasal mucosa. OBJECTIVE: To determine if children with a history of allergic disease have impaired responses to LPS on circulating CD4(+) leucocytes. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from children (aged 2-18) and adults with or without a history of atopic conditions were cultured with/without IL-4 or LPS for up to 24 h. Expression of surface TLR-4, CD14, CD4, CD3, as well as of intracellular phosphorylated (p42/p44) ERK and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) were assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: A history of atopy in children was associated with impaired LPS-induced TLR-4-dependent phosphorylation of (p42/44) ERK and p38 MAPK by CD4(+) monocytes. Decreased LPS signalling was reproduced by pre-incubation of control cells with recombinant IL-4. LPS stimulation also decreased TLR-4 expression on monocytes from children without atopic histories but not from atopic subjects. CD4(+) T lymphocytes showed limited LPS responsiveness, regardless of atopic status. In contrast with non-atopic children, TLR-4 expression on monocytes of children with atopic histories decreased as a function of age. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for defective LPS recognition on circulating CD4(+) leucocytes of subjects with atopic histories compared with those from non-atopic children. CD4(+) TLR4(+) monocytes from children with atopic histories failed to phosphorylate MAPKs. Our results suggest that a history of atopic disease is associated with impaired TLR-4-mediated innate immune function compared with non-atopic children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".