MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1599073479

Erie's International Effect

2013· article· en· W1599073479 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael S. Green

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthwestern University law review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorthwestern University
KeywordsArgument (complex analysis)DoctrineContext (archaeology)Choice of lawInternational lawLawPolitical scienceState (computer science)Law and economicsForeign policyConflict of lawsFederal common lawFederal lawCommon lawSociologyPoliticsLegislationHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In his important article, When Erie Goes International, Professor Childress addresses the marvelous question of the Erie doctrine's application in an international context. 1 In particular, Childress argues that Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co., 2 which held that a federal court sitting in diversity (or alienage) must borrow the choice-of-law rules of the state where the federal court is located, should not apply when the federal court chooses between state law and the law of a foreign nation.3 In this Essay, I have three points to make in response-one clarificatory and two critical.The clarificatory point is that even if Childress is correct, the bulk of the Erie doctrine applies unchanged in international cases.Childress's arguments are directed solely to Klaxon and international choice of law.The first critical point concerns the merits of Childress's arguments, all but one of which give us no reason to think that Klaxon should be abandoned in international cases.The one argument that has any success is that a federal court's choice between state and foreign law implicates federal interests in foreign relations, in particular comity with the foreign nation.These federal interests can indeed override Klaxon's command.But this brings me to my second critical point: Childress exaggerates the extent to which these federal interests will displace Klaxon.Whereas he thinks that federal law will preempt much-or perhaps all-state law on international choice of law, I argue that preemption will be rare. I. MOST OF ERIE STILL APPLIES IN AN INTERNATIONAL CONTEXTEVEN IF CHILDRESS'S ARGUMENTS SUCCEED Even if the arguments in Childress's article succeed, their effect is relatively narrow.Most of the Erie doctrine still applies in an international context.To see why, consider an international Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins.4 In the original Erie, Tompkins, a Pennsylvania domiciliary, was struck by something protruding from one of Erie's trains-probably an open door-while trespassing on Erie's property in Pennsylvania.He sued

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0110.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0850.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorthwestern University law reviewSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207