MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1599260927

Antropologia dels sentits. Selecció bibliogràfica

2005· article· ca· W1599260927 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista d'etnologia de Catalunya · 2005
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterary and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I. U n a anotacio a l a bibl iograf ia d e L'antropologia dels sentits: els deu t ex tos m e s i m p o r tants. Margaret Kenna (Universitat de Gal.les Swansea, Regne Unit). Si algu volgues revisar I'estat contemporani de I'antrapologia dels sentits hauria de comengar amb el llibre font editat per David Howes i titulat The Vorieties of Sensory Experience (Howes ed. 199 I), parant una atencio especial a I'assaig introductori de Howes i a la conclusio de Howes i Classen que ofereix un paradigma per estudiar el sensorium (un terme derivat de la primera seccio de The Presence of the Word de Walter Ong [ I 9671 que tambe estd reeditada al volum de Howes). Howes i els seus companys amb6 ofereixen un recompte d'ultima hora de la seva posicio i recerca actual a la pagina web de la Universitat Concordia (Canada). D'altres questions generals recents inclouen Landscopes of the Mind (1990) de Porteous i Worlds of Sense (1 993) de Classen, per6 els lectors potser volen tornar a la questi6 de Whor f a Language, Thought ond Reolity dels diversos mons conceptuals dels hopis i la Mitjana europea estdndard tal i com s'expressa a traves del llenguatge (Whorf 1956). Mitjangant estudis recents dels cinc sentits occidentals, els lectors podran construir una bibliografia de les fonts classiques. Per a I'olfacte es recomana Ammo (1 994) de Classen, Howes i Synnott; per al gust, The Taste of EthnogrophicThings (1 989) de Stoller i Memories of Repasts (2001) de David Sutton. Per als sons i I'oi'da (tambe fent referencia a I'acustimologia, la manera acustica d'entendre un escenari concret amb els seus sons), I'argumentacio de Stoller al llibre que acabem de mencionar sobre I'existencia en algunes societats u un bon exemple per comengar podria ser amb I'obra de Berlin i Kay basada en el color (1969). Finalment, pel que fa al tacte i a la percepcio dctil, considerats sovint a la cultura occidental com una associacio amb la infantesa i amb les dones i amb la intimitat de les relacions de la llar mes que no pas amb la maduresa, els homes i el domini politicojural, trobem una font tipica en I'estudi de Leenhardt de les conceptualitzacions tdctils en una societat melanesia (1 979). Referencies esmentades

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it