MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1599438797 · doi:10.1353/mdr.2001.0020

No Longer in Search of an Author, a Character Defines Herself: Pirandello's Six Characters in Search of an Author and Eugenio Barba's Experimental Performance Methodology

2001· article· en· W1599438797 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Seth Baumrin

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Luigi Pirandello's work is unique. among early-twentieth-century playwrights, in part because of his freedom from false intellectual positions the isms. In his coup de theatre, Six Characters in Search of an Author (1922), Pirandello took neither August Strindberg's theoretical stance proposing a characterless drama in his Foreword to Miss Julie (64) nor Bertolt Brecht's position, in his Short Organum for the Theatre, that a should be constructed out of opposites, as a man standing in a valley and making a speech whose gradually changing views echo off the mountainside only to meet and contradict each other as they reverberate (191). Both Brecht and Strindberg saw the notion of as c1assist; Strindberg called character the middle class term for the automaton (64). For them, was a static, prefabricated facet of the mainstream theatre apparatus that reflects the value system of the ruling class, or what has come to be known as dominant culture. Yet by thus attacking the notion of as an agent of dominant culture, they confirm the incredible power of as performance's mystical unifying factor. In Six Characters Pirandello demonstrates that characters are autonomous and that their organic composition stems from something other than the author, actor, or culture. This article establishes a link between Pirandello's exploration of characters and Eugenio Barba's more recent examination of the actor! relationship. First, however, it is necessary to provide a Pirandellian context for characters and actors. It may seem ironic that Pirandello was on good terms with the ruling class. He publicly supported Mussolini, but his writing in no way reflects Fascist ideology; in fact, it may resist such authority. The subtle metatheatricality and formalism of Pi ran delio's plays are also evinced by authors in other nations under authoritarian if not totalitarian regimes, most notably Spanish dramatists Lope de Vega, Calder6n de la Barca, Ramon Valle-Inclan, Federico Garefa Lorca, and Antonio Buero Vallejo. These dramatists use what has come to be known as the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207