MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1599467185 · doi:10.5539/res.v7n11p7

The Influence of Employee Training and Discipline Work against Employee Performance PT. Merpati Nusantara Airlines (Persero)

2015· article· en· W1599467185 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of European Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployee Performance and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSample (material)StatisticsTest (biology)PopulationData collectionPsychologyWork (physics)Simple random sampleBusiness administrationSampling (signal processing)ManagementMathematicsMarketingBusinessEngineeringSociologyMechanical engineeringEconomicsDemographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to know and test whether there is influence of employee training, discipline working simultaneously and partially against the performance of employees, while the second to know and test between two variables where employee training and discipline work the most dominant and influential on the performance of employees in SBU Pigeons Maintenance Facility at Surabaya, PT Merpati Nusantara Airlines (Persero). This research method using a quantitative approach, with a population of 147 employee by using Sample totaled 107 employees. While its analysis technique using Multiple Linear Regression Statistics. The technique used is the sample determination technique where random sampling with this sampling technique researchers randomly sampled. Where every Member of a population is given the same rights or portion to be used as a sample of the research. The process of sampling done by the employee name and the other in the name of the exit numbers were drawn in, then the person who made the research sample. Furthermore the names that are listed in the research sample group given questionnaires as a means of data collection. The results of this research is the correlation coefficient (R) is equal to 0.616; indicates that there is a strong link between training and discipline work against the performance of employees. Whereas the coefficient of determination (R square) of 0.379. From the results of the hypothesis that the value of the F test results obtained with the values F calculate = 31,740 sig. = 0.000 (0.000 £ 0.05), it means the training and discipline of the influential work simultaneously towards the performance of employees. Hypothesis testing and the results obtained the training variables t calculate = sig-value 5,185.0000 and work discipline t calculate = sig-value 2,285.0024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it