The Influence of Employee Training and Discipline Work against Employee Performance PT. Merpati Nusantara Airlines (Persero)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to know and test whether there is influence of employee training, discipline working simultaneously and partially against the performance of employees, while the second to know and test between two variables where employee training and discipline work the most dominant and influential on the performance of employees in SBU Pigeons Maintenance Facility at Surabaya, PT Merpati Nusantara Airlines (Persero). This research method using a quantitative approach, with a population of 147 employee by using Sample totaled 107 employees. While its analysis technique using Multiple Linear Regression Statistics. The technique used is the sample determination technique where random sampling with this sampling technique researchers randomly sampled. Where every Member of a population is given the same rights or portion to be used as a sample of the research. The process of sampling done by the employee name and the other in the name of the exit numbers were drawn in, then the person who made the research sample. Furthermore the names that are listed in the research sample group given questionnaires as a means of data collection. The results of this research is the correlation coefficient (R) is equal to 0.616; indicates that there is a strong link between training and discipline work against the performance of employees. Whereas the coefficient of determination (R square) of 0.379. From the results of the hypothesis that the value of the F test results obtained with the values F calculate = 31,740 sig. = 0.000 (0.000 £ 0.05), it means the training and discipline of the influential work simultaneously towards the performance of employees. Hypothesis testing and the results obtained the training variables t calculate = sig-value 5,185.0000 and work discipline t calculate = sig-value 2,285.0024.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".