Bullying in physical education : its prevalence & impact on the intention to continue secondary school physical education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of bullying in physical education classes and its influence on students’ intention to participate in the class in the future. The study also examined the relationship between bullying and body dissatisfaction as well as bullying and physical competence in physical education. A survey was utilized to collect both quantitative and qualitative data about students’ experiences in physical education class. Two-hundred and thirty-four grade students (144 F; 90 M) in Grade 10 physical education classes from 8 different secondary schools located in school boards in Southern Ontario, Canada participated in the study. Data analyses were completed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Results showed that approximately 11.1% of respondents had experienced physical bullying in physical education; 13.6% had experienced verbal bullying; and 12.8% experienced social bullying. Furthermore, those who experienced frequent bullying in physical education did not intend on taking the class in the future. The relationship between body dissatisfaction and bullying was not found to be significant. However, physical competence was found to significantly predict bullying in physical education. These results show how prevalent bullying is in physical education classes and how it negatively impacts future participation in the class. Cette etude vise a determiner la prevalence de l’intimidation pendant les cours d’education physique et ses effets sur le desir des eleves de suivre d’autres cours d’education physique a l’avenir. L’etude examine aussi les liens entre l’intimidation et l’insatisfaction corporelle, et entre l’intimidation et la competence physique en education physique. On a eu recours a un sondage pour recueillir des donnees quantitatives et qualitatives sur les experiences des eleves pendant les cours d’education physique. Deux cent-trente-quatre eleves de 10e annee (144 filles et 90 garcons) suivant des cours d’education physique et frequentant huit ecoles secondaires relevant de divers conseils scolaires du sud de l’Ontario (Canada) ont participe a l’etude. On a utilise la version 16.0 de l’Ensemble des programmes statistiques relatifs aux sciences sociales (SPSS) pour analyser les donnees. Les resultats revelent que quelque 11,1 % des repondants ont ete victimes d’intimidation dans le cadre de leurs cours d’education physique; que 13,6 % ont ete victimes d’intimidation verbale et 12,8 % d’intimidation sociale. En outre, les eleves qui ont ete victimes d’intimidation a plusieurs reprises pendant les cours d’education physique n’avaient aucun desir de suivre d’autres cours du genre a l’avenir. On a constate que les liens entre l’intimidation et l’insatisfaction corporelle etaient tenus, mais que la competence physique semblait etre un bon predicteur d’intimidation pendant les cours d’education physique. Ces resultats confirment la prevalence de l’intimidation pendant les cours d’education physique et ses effets nefastes sur la participation future a de tels cours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".