Les composantes patrimoniales du canoë récréatif au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le canoë est indissociable de la formation du Canada et de son histoire, de celle des Indiens et, à partir du xviesiècle, de celle des Européens, trappeurs, coureurs des bois, prospecteurs, voyageurs, et des Métis. De fait, l’histoire de ce vaste pays explique et s’explique par les évolutions techniques de la production de ce canoë. Dans cet article, nous tentons de comprendre la place et le rôle social et économique du canoë et sa dimension culturelle, les relations à la Nature et au territoire qu’il autorise, et en quoi il fut aussi bien élément essentiel de mode de vie que moyen de déplacement et de transport, et notamment pour la traite des fourrures. Nous nous attacherons aussi à comprendre comment ce canoë, d’utilitaire, est essentiellement devenu récréatif au cours du XXesiècle, et comment, au cours de ces évolutions, il est devenu cet emblème patrimonial, jusqu’à ce que ce loisir largement diffusé au sein du grand public perde en aura patrimoniale ce qu’il gagne en succès comme loisir sportif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".