MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1599650503 · doi:10.1080/03632415.2015.1038381

The Science Framework for Implementing the Fisheries Protection Provisions of Canada's Fisheries Act

2015· article· en· W1599650503 on OpenAlex
Jake Rice, Michael J. Bradford, Keith D. Clarke, Marten A. Koops, Robert G. Randall, Roger Wysocki

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFisheryProductivityFisheries managementBusinessSustainabilityFisheries lawFisheries scienceEnvironmental resource managementFishingNatural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceEcologyEconomicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In 2012, Canada's Fisheries Act was amended. New fisheries protection provisions provide for the sustainability and ongoing productivity of commercial, recreational, and Aboriginal fisheries. These provisions replace previous provisions that focused on fish habitats, and concerns have been expressed that the amended Act has lowered aquatic habitat protection. The science framework developed for implementation of the new provisions is based on the relationships between fisheries productivity and the response of habitats or populations to pressures, with pressures linked to specific classes of activities through pathways of effects models. The framework includes guidance on quantifying productivity, scales and types of impacts, establishing equivalence in offsetting, and managing risk. Risk of failing to achieve the intent of the fisheries protection provisions is only managed when impacts of activities have a net neutral or positive effect on fisheries productivity. This standard applies whether the evaluation of an activity is by self- or assisted assessment or a more comprehensive project evaluation. En el año 2012, el Acta Pesquera de Canadá fue enmendada. Las nuevas provisiones para la protección de pesquerías tienen como objetivo proveer sustentabilidad y productividad a las pesquerías comerciales, recreativas y nativas. Estas provisiones reemplazan varias de las anteriores que se enfocaban en el hábitat de los peces, y ahora se han suscitado ciertas preocupaciones en cuanto a que el acta enmendada reduce la protección de hábitats acuáticos. El contexto científico que se ha desarrollado para implementar las nuevas provisiones se basa en la relación entre la productividad pesquera y la respuesta de los hábitats o de las poblaciones a las presiones; presiones que a su vez se relacionan con tipos específicos de actividades mediante modelos de “rutas de efectos”. El contexto incluye guías de cómo cuantificar la productividad, tipos y escala de los impactos, establecimiento de equivalencias compensatorias y manejo del riesgo. El riesgo de que no se logren cumplir los objetivos de las provisiones de protección de las pesquerías, comienza a ser controlado sólo cuando el impacto de las actividades tiene un efecto neto neutral o positivo en la productividad pesquera. Este estándar aplica ya sea cuando la evaluación de la actividad es asistida o bien auto evaluación, o cuando se hace mediante un proyecto de evaluación más exhaustivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it