MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600617043

Blended learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy

2012· article· en· W1600617043 on OpenAlexaff
Norman Vaughan

Bibliographic record

VenueIndiana Magazine of History (Indiana University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Assessment and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlended learningMathematics educationStudent engagementComputer scienceTheme (computing)Face (sociological concept)MultimediaScholarship of Teaching and LearningPedagogyWorld Wide WebEducational technologyTeaching methodPsychologySociologyTeaching and learning center
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation: Francine S. Glazer, Editor. (2012). Blended Learning: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus. 138 pages. ISBN: 978-1-57922-324-3 (pbk) Publisher Description: This is a practical introduction to blended learning, presenting examples of implementation across a broad spectrum of disciplines. For faculty unfamiliar with this mode of teaching, it illustrates how to address the core challenge of blended learning—to link the activities in each medium so that they reinforce each other to create a single, unified, course—and offers models they can adapt. Francine Glazer and the contributors to this book describe how they integrate a wide range of pedagogical approaches in their blended courses, use groups to build learning communities, and make the online environment attractive to students. They illustrate under what circumstances particular tasks and activities work best online or face-to-face, and when to incorporate synchronous and asynchronous interactions. They introduce the concept of layering the content of courses to appropriately sequence material for beginning and experienced learners, and to ensure that students see both the online and the face-to-face components as being equal in value and devote equal effort to both modalities. The underlying theme of this book is encouraging students to develop the skills to continue learning throughout their lives. By allowing students to take more time and reflect on the course content, blended learning can promote more student engagement and, consequently, deeper learning. It appeals to today’s digital natives who are accustomed to using technology to find and share information, communicate, and collaborate, and also enables non-traditional students to juggle their commitments more efficiently and successfully. Blended Learning: Across the Disciplines, Across the Academy is an edited book by Francine Glazer. The book describes five blended learning case studies. The case studies are from a variety of disciplines and institutions in American higher education. The authors of each case study have taken a self-study approach to explore their blended learning courses (Bullough & Pinnegar, 2001). The introductory chapter of this book does an excellent job of setting the stage for the five case studies by clearly defining blended learning as “courses [that] employ active learning strategies through the use of a variety of pedagogical approaches (p.3) . . . When done well, blended learning combines the best attributes of face-to-face and online courses” (p.7). Glazer also indicates that “one size does not fit all” when it comes to course redesign and that the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndiana Magazine of History (Indiana University)Same topicEducational Assessment and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207