Record W1600920379 · doi:10.11248/ehum.v5i2.876

SILENCIAMENTO: A HISTORIOGRAFIA SOBRE A EDUCAÇAO FEMININA NA COLÔNIA

2012· article· pt· W1600920379 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Fernanda Costa Frazão, Christianni Cardoso Morais

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2012

Typearticle

Languagept

FieldArts and Humanities

TopicHistory of Education Research in Brazil

Canadian institutionsnot available

Fundersnot available

KeywordsPolitical science

DOI10.11248/ehum.v5i2.876

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO: O objetivo de nosso trabalho é analisar a produção historiográfica acerca da história da educação feminina no Brasil referente ao período colonial. Tomamos como fontes de pesquisa os resumos e trabalhos completos publicados nas edições I a VI do Congresso Brasileiro de História da Educação (realizadas em 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008 e 2011) e do I ao VI Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em História da Educação em Minas Gerais (2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009 e 2011). Ademais, os artigos de 27 números da Revista Brasileira de História da Educação, publicados entre 2001 e 2011. A discussão que se apresenta diante dos trabalhos examinados nos sugere duas questões norteadoras: a primeira relativa às fontes disponíveis para a pesquisa histórica, em que se ressalta a escassez de documentos que dizem respeito diretamente às mulheres no período colonial. Em segundo lugar, examinamos as condições sociais e educacionais vividas pelas mulheres. Destacamos que a institucionalização da educação feminina teve objetivos e ritmos bastante diferenciados da educação oferecida ao sexo masculino. A educação para as mulheres não era algo reconhecido como necessário, como bem evidencia o caso exemplar da legalização do ensino feminino elaborada no reinado de D. Maria I (1777-1792) e que não fora efetivada. A educação das mulheres era realizada prioritariamente no ambiente doméstico, restringindo-se ao aprendizado das habilidades básicas de leitura e escrita, Doutrina Cristã, prendas domésticas (trabalhos de agulha) e, em alguns casos, música. Tais iniciativas de cunho privado quase não nos legaram registros. Assim, a partir das restrições educacionais das mulheres e limitação de fontes sobre suas experiências educativas no período colonial, consideramos que o sexo feminino viveu em uma zona de silenciamento. PALAVRAS-CHAVE:História da educação feminina; período colonial; educação doméstica. ABSTRACT: The aim of our work is to analyze the historical production about the history of women's education in Brazil regarding the colonial period. We take as source the abstract and full papers published in the editions I to VI of the Brazilian Congress of History of Education (held in 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2011) and I to VI Congress of Research and Training in History Education in Ontario (2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009 and 2011). Moreover, Articles 27 numbers of the Journal of the History of Education, published between 2001 and 2011. The discussion that presents himself before the work suggests examined in two guiding questions: the first relating to the sources available for historical research, in which highlights the lack of documents that relate directly to women in the colonial period. Second, we examine the social and educational conditions experienced by women. We emphasize that the institutionalization of women's education goals and had quite different rhythms of the male sex education offered. Education for women was not something recognized as necessary, as well shows the exemplary case of the legalization of female education developed in the reign of Queen Mary I (1777-1792) and which was not honored. Women's education was conducted primarily in the home, restricting themselves to learning the basic skills of reading and writing, Christian Doctrine, housewives (needlework) and, in some cases, music. Such private initiatives nature hardly left us records. Thus, from the educational constraints of women and limited sources of their educational experiences in the colonial period, we consider that females lived in a muting area. KEYWORDS: History of female education; colonial period; domestic education. Recebido: 30/06/2012 Aceito 26/10/2012

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002

metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001

Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated

Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

Consensus categoriesnone

DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none

Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none

GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none

Teacher disagreement score0.886

Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

Category	Codex	Gemma
Metaresearch	0.002	0.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)	0.001	0.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)	0.001	0.001
Bibliometrics	0.001	0.001
Science and technology studies	0.004	0.000
Scholarly communication	0.001	0.002
Open science	0.002	0.000
Research integrity	0.001	0.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)	0.003	0.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041

GPT teacher head0.279

Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work

Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Meta-epidemiology (narrow)Science and technology studies Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

Study designNot applicable

Domainnot available

GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0

Published2012

Admission routes1

Has abstractyes

Download record (JSON)Report an issue with this record

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicHistory of Education Research in Brazil→French-language works237,207→