Measures of immune system status in young‐of‐the‐year winter flounder<i>Pseudopleuronectes americanus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The immune status of young-of-the-year (YOY) winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus was evaluated in fish collected from six areas around Long Island, NY, U.S.A. representing more urban areas with high population density in the west, to less densely populated more rural areas in to the east. Gene expression markers for innate immunity (pleurocidin) and contaminant exposure (cytochrome P4501A; cyp1a) were measured in liver and fin of fish collected at each site. Expression of pleurocidin was significantly higher in fin than liver, but was highly variable among individuals. Some statistically significant differences in pleurocidin expression among sites were observed, although elevated levels were not associated with degree of urbanization. Expression was related in part to fish size: a positive correlation between expression and total length (LT ) of fish was observed with the largest LT class (>125 mm) exhibiting significantly elevated pleurocidin expression as compared with fish in the smaller LT class. This indicates that immune competency may increase with age. No site-specific differences in cyp1a expression were observed. These data suggest that exposure to aromatic hydrocarbon contaminants is fairly widespread throughout the study area and that any differences in pleurocidin expression in YOY P. americanus are probably due to other factors. Antimicrobial activity was also measured as a functional indicator of immune response. Activity was highly variable, showing no significant site-specific differences, and no significant correlation to pleurocidin expression. The lack of correlation between pleurocidin expression and antimicrobial activity indicates that other antimicrobial peptides may be active against the bacteria tested or that other factors are influencing antimicrobial activity. This is the first quantitative evaluation of pleurocidin expression in YOY P. americanus from an urban area. Further work is needed to characterize factors controlling pleurocidin expression, as well as other indicators of immune response in young fish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".