L'instabilite des gains familiaux et du revenu familial au Canada, 1986 a 1991 et 1996 a 2001
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous etudions l'evolution de l'instabilite des gains familiaux de la fin des annees 1980 a la fin des annees 1990 et du revenu familial d'un segment a l'autre de la courbe de distribution des gains familiaux. Nous degageons quatre grands profils. Premierement, dans le sous ensemble de familles demeurees intactes de 1982 a 1991 et de 1992 a 2001, l'instabilite des gains familiaux a peu varie de la fin des annees 1980 a la fin des annees 1990. Deuxiemement, la dispersion des gains permanents des familles est devenue beaucoup plus inegale au cours de cette periode. Troisiemement, les familles classees dans le tertile inferieur de la distribution des gains (selon l'age) de 1992 a 1995 ont eu, de 1996 a 2000, un revenu du marche nettement plus instable que leurs homologues du tertile superieur. Quatriemement, parmi les familles dont le mari avait moins de 45 ans, le regime d'impots et de transferts a, durant la periode allant de 1996 a 2001, elimine au moins les deux tiers (et jusqu'à la totalite) des differences d'instabilite (exprimees en gains/pertes proportionnels de revenu) du revenu du marche familial observees entre les familles des tertiles inferieur et superieur. Ce resultat met en relief le role stabilisateur cle joue par le regime d'impots et de transferts, un aspect auquel assez peu d'attention a ete accordee durant les annees 1990, au moment de la reforme de l'assurance emploi (l'assurance chomage) et de l'assistance sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes | Observational | high |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".