MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601999395

From Object of Poverty to National Treasure: The Ambiguous Place of Catholic Convents in Quebec and the Rhetoric of Heritage

2004· article· en· W1601999395 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Culture Review / Revue de la culture matérielle · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnologyPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convents and Catholic religious institutions undeniably constitute an important component of Quebec's religious heritage. Yet, popular and official interest in and concern over the preservation of these buildings seems to have grown exponentially in the last decade. Arguments over the demolition and reuse of properties of religious communities of women reveal the wide-ranging attitudes of concerned citizens, members of sisterhoods and the clergy, heritage advocates, and government. The ways religious heritage has been defined and packaged (for tourist consumption, to bolster national narratives) reflect not only gender asymmetries within the attribution and appreciation of religious heritage but also ambivalence toward the role of the Church in Quebec history. Resume Les couvents et autres etablissements religieux catholiques constituent indeniablement une composante importante du patrimoine religieux du Quebec. Au cours de la derniere decennie, les interets populaires et officiels a preserver ces bâtiments et les preoccupations a cet egard ont augmente de facon exponentielle. Les discussions sur la demolition ou l'attribution de nouvelles vocations aux edifices des communautes religieuses de femmes revelent la grande diversite des attitudes des citoyens, des membres de communautes de femmes et du clerge, des defenseurs du patrimoine ainsi que du gouvernement. La facon dont le patrimoine religieux a ete defini et presente (pour consommation touristique, pour justifier le discours nationaliste) reflete non seulement des asymetries en fonction de l'appartenance a un sexe dans l'attribution et l'appreciation de ce patrimoine, mais aussi une ambivalence envers le role joue par l'Eglise dans l'histoire du Quebec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it