MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602005497 · doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-02-06422-5

Natural bound in Kwiecinski’s criterion for flatness

2002· article· en· W1602005497 on OpenAlexaff
Janusz Adamus

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlatness (cosmology)MorphismMathematicsIdeal (ethics)Component (thermodynamics)Upper and lower boundsCombinatoricsPure mathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisDiscrete mathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kwieciński has proved a geometric criterion for flatness: A morphism <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="f colon upper X right-arrow upper Y"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false"> → </mml:mo> <mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">f:X\to Y</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> of germs of analytic spaces is not flat if and only if its <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="i hyphen fold"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:mtext>-fold</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">i\text {-fold}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> fibre power <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="f Superscript StartSet i EndSet Baseline colon upper X Superscript StartSet i EndSet Baseline right-arrow upper Y"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">{</mml:mo> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo>:</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">{</mml:mo> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false"> → </mml:mo> <mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">f^{\{i\}} :X^{\{i\}}\to Y</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has a vertical component, for <italic>some</italic> <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="i"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">i</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . We show how to bound <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="i"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">i</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> using Hironaka’s local flattener: If <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="f"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">f</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is not flat, then <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="f Superscript StartSet d EndSet"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msup> <mml:mi>f</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">{</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mo fence="false" stretchy="false">}</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">f^{\{d\}}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> has a vertical component, where <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="d"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">d</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> is the minimal number of generators of the ideal in <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper O Subscript upper Y"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>Y</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{\mathcal {O}}_{Y}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> of the flattener of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper X"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>X</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">X</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207