Motor oriented stimulation program during the premature children independent walking acquisition.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Prematurity may act negatively in the course of some motor slill, such as the independent walking acquisition. Objective: It is about an identify the independent walking acquisition age in premature infants of different gestational ages, distinguish the period of independent walking acquisition among the lower economic classes and compare the independent walking acquisition with data in the literature. Method: This research is characterized as a developmental study. The sample is 21 premature infants of both sexes. Assessments and individual data collection were carried out monthly and at the end of the study, at the largest child´s living environment, and that every month the parents / caregivers previously received orientation and demonstration regarding the procedure for applying the stimulation protocol, presented in an illustrative and demonstrative primer. The instrument used for the monthly assessment was the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and the questionnaire of the Brazilian Association of Business and Research (ABEP), to get the socioeconomic status of the children´s family. The results were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Analyzed the age of ability to walk due to the low socioeconomic level through the Kruskal-Wallis test (C1, C2 and D). Results: When comparing the independent walking acquisition age and gestational age, the group with less than 33 weeks of gestational age acquired independent walking later than the group with gestational age between 33-37 weeks. However, it was found that the children average age of independent walking in the study was 14 ± 2 months. Comparing independent walking acquisition age and low economic levels (C1, C2 and D), the group with higher socioeconomic status (C1) acquired independent walking two months before the group with the lowest economic level. Conclusion: influenced positively the motor performance of premature infants in the acquisition of independent walking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".